You are currently viewing Defending Against A DUI Charge

Defending Against A DUI Charge

Defending against charges of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework surrounding such offenses and strategic advocacy to challenge the prosecution’s case. While every DUI case is unique and may present challenges, several common defense strategies can be employed to mitigate the potential consequences of a DUI charge.

Challenging The Initial Traffic Stop

In many DUI cases, the legality of the traffic stop itself can be called into question. Law enforcement officers must have reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle, typically based on observed traffic violations or other suspicious behavior. If the stop was made without proper justification or in violation of the driver’s constitutional rights, any evidence obtained after that, including the results of sobriety tests or chemical tests, may be deemed inadmissible in court.

A DUI lawyer may file a motion to suppress evidence obtained during an unlawful stop, potentially leading to the dismissal of charges.

Disputing Field Sobriety Tests

Field sobriety tests, such as the Walk-and-Turn, One-Leg Stand, and Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus tests, are commonly used by law enforcement officers to assess a driver’s level of impairment. However, these tests are not always accurate indicators of intoxication and can be influenced by various factors, including weather conditions, physical disabilities, and nervousness.

DUI lawyers may challenge the validity of field sobriety tests by highlighting factors that could have compromised their reliability, such as inadequate instructions or improper administration by the arresting officer.

Questioning The Accuracy Of Chemical Tests

Chemical tests, such as breath, blood, or urine, measure a driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) during arrest. However, these tests are not infallible and can produce inaccurate results due to various factors, including equipment malfunction, improper calibration, or contamination of samples.

A DUI lawyer may seek to challenge the accuracy of chemical tests by examining the procedures followed by law enforcement personnel, scrutinizing the maintenance records of testing equipment, or retaining independent experts to conduct their own analysis of blood or urine samples.

Asserting Medical Or Physical Conditions

Certain medical or physical conditions can mimic the symptoms of intoxication, leading to false suspicions of DUI. Conditions such as diabetes, inner ear disorders, or neurological impairments can affect a person’s balance, coordination, and cognitive function, potentially leading to failed sobriety tests or erratic driving behavior.

DUI lawyers may present evidence of such conditions to argue that their client’s actions were not indicative of impairment by alcohol or drugs.

Negotiating Plea Bargains Or Alternative Sentencing

In some cases, it may be advantageous for the defense to negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecution, wherein the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser offense in exchange for reduced charges or penalties. Alternatively, defendants may be eligible for diversion programs, rehabilitation, or community service instead of incarceration, especially if they have no prior criminal record and demonstrate a commitment to addressing underlying substance abuse issues.

Mounting a successful defense against DUI charges requires a thorough examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case and strategic advocacy to challenge the prosecution’s evidence. By employing a combination of legal expertise, investigative resources, and negotiation skills, a DUI lawyer can help their clients navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system and minimize the potential consequences of a DUI conviction.

Thank you to our friends at May Law, LLP for their insight into DUI charges.